Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

April 25, 2025

Combat in opposition to Hackney Council’s motorbike parking char…

0
6-to-8-motorcycles-can-fit-into-a-single-car-parking-space_1.jpg

[ad_1]

Save London Motorcycling has criticised a panel set-up to scrutinise Hackney Council’s motorbike parking cost proposals within the London borough.

Save London Motorcycling (SLMC) has been on the forefront of the campaigns in opposition to Hackney Council’s motorbike parking costs since early-2022. 

Since then, the proposed costs have been decreased from what might have been £14,000 per yr per bike to what now ought to be round £2,300 per yr per bike, together with electrical bikes. 

When Visordown requested Hackney Council about its motorbike parking cost proposals, it stated it hoped that the fees on all powered two-wheelers (PTW) would encourage extra individuals to cycle or use public transport.

The newest improvement is {that a} scrutiny panel, set-up by Inexperienced and Conservative Occasion councillors on Hackney Council, has failed to attain any change within the Council’s plans. That is regardless of a 77.3% disagreement with the plans amongst these requested for his or her opinion in a session, and an expectation that the fees will put these residing and dealing in Hackney into transport poverty. 

A Save London Motorcycling spokesperson stated: “We, alongside hundreds of others, don’t settle for this outcome. The council has a duty to make coverage that’s evidence-based and to watch the impression of their insurance policies on those that shall be affected most. On this among the lowest paid staff and most weak Hackney residents will endure excessive hardship as a direct outcome.

“Yesterday’s charade of scrutiny laid naked the utter farce which is governance in Hackney at present. The panel’s questions clearly revealed elementary flaws within the coverage, however nonetheless Councillors voted to blindly press forward with utterly unprecedented and devastating costs with none thought what the impacts shall be.

“After spending over an hour discussing the price of residing disaster, foodbank use and the devastating impression of a £10 every week profit lower, within the very subsequent merchandise Councillors dismissed their £50 every week costs for motorbike and scooter riders as being reasonably priced and insignificant. This degree of hypocrisy defies perception, and reveals any pretence of Labour Hackney Councillors caring about hard-pressed residents and staff is nothing however cynical empty gesturing.

“We urge everybody involved with equity and the lives and livelihoods of Hackney staff, residents, and carers to affix our marketing campaign and get up in opposition to this injustice, and all Hackney residents to rigorously take into account whether or not this Council shows the requirements they need from their representatives.”

Steve Garelick of GMB Union stated: “We’re astonished that regardless of engagement with the coalition representing PTW riders together with GMB that Hackney have chosen to disregard constructive and priceless options and take a place that appears to make staff lives tougher and create better expense which will result in an exodus of staff and enterprise resulting from draconian pricing on a transport mode that has low emissions impression compared to plant equipment, emissions from eating places and standard autos together with buses and LGVs. It’s hoped that Hackney councillors rethink this coverage.”

Yamaha Niken GT Assessment (2023) | Testing the most recent Niken in Sardinia

[ad_2]

Source_link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *